Such a practice is unsavory, but it is a common tactic. Ford Expedition Recall Lawsuit Get the Right Lawyer. The well-funded insurance firm may dump a slew of interrogatories on the plaintiff in an attempt to drive up legal expenses and force a settlement. The plaintiff is represented by a lawyer from a small firm that doesn't have a ton of resources to try the case. For example, let's say you've got a car wreck case and the defendant is represented by an insurance company. There are times when a fishing expedition is used simply to harass the opposing party in a case. A party can submit a lot of interrogatories and requests for production to another, but that doesn't mean all of those questions have to be answered and all the documents must be provided.Ī party can object to anything unreasonable and a good lawyer will do just that when faced with what amounts to a fishing expedition during the discovery process.
May 30, - that's what objections are for. Once a negative impression of the defendant is made, jurors could find it more difficult to see his or her side of the case and reach an impartial decision. To learn more about the Expedition, visit Leo Kaytes Ford. But how many jurors will actually be able to ignore the question? By not answering, the jurors might wonder what the defendant is trying to hide. The Ford Expedition packs a powerful engine under its hood and yet remains remarkably efficient. Yes, the judge can sustain the objection and instruct the jury to ignore the question. Even if the defendant's attorney objects, the very question could do some damage to the defendant's case. For example, an attorney might ask a question that, if answered, would cause a jury to think less of a defendant. One of these can actually be very prejudicial during a trial.
0 kommentar(er)
